Re: [Peugeot-L] Re: 405 S questions

From: Tae Jin Park <tpark74_at_verizon.net>
Date: 12/03/07

all PRV is full aluminum from the developement and all the way to the 24 valve version. Head and block.

N9T, heads is aluminum not iron. The block is iron for sure. tj

  • Original Message ----- From: Francisco X. Romo To: peugeot-L@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 4:59 PM Subject: [Peugeot-L] Re: 405 S questions

  Interesting... I thought all PRV's were made of iron...

  Now you made me doubt about my ZPJ. I know when I changed coolant   last time, I was *SURE* it was iron just by looking at all the   yellow/rusty fluid that came out...

  Maybe only the heads are iron (ala N9T)? hmmmm....

  • In peugeot-L@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Bruce" <bobbruce@...> wrote:
    >
    > It's aluminum alright
    > without the aluminum heads and pan/bearing caps it weighs about 5 lb
    > and looks like it would fit in a boot box
    >
    > It is shockingly small
    >
    > Bob
    >
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: Francisco X. Romo
    > To: peugeot-L@yahoogroups.com
    > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 4:35 PM
    > Subject: [Peugeot-L] Re: 405 S questions
    >
    >
    > Hi Brian,
    >
    > Are you sure the (zn3j) V6 block is aluminum? I ask cause I know
    my
    > 605 ZPJ is iron so....
    >
    > --- In peugeot-L@yahoogroups.com, Brian Holm <peugeots@> wrote:
    > >
    > > Mike,
    > >
    > > You would definitely be right if this were an xc, xm, or xn
    engine,
    > > but it's a 405, and I have never heard of a cracked 405 head.
    > >
    > > In my experience with USModel Peugeots, I have found that all
    of
    > the
    > > iron block engines (with the possible exception of the 304,
    with
    > > which I have too little experience) crack heads routinely at
    high
    > > (and some not-so-high) mileages, while none of the aluminum
    block
    > > engines do (xu9-. zdjl, zm-zn-).
    > >
    > > Has anyone found to the contrary? How about with non-USModel
    > Peugeots?
    > >
    > > Brian Holm
    > > Parts for Peugeots
    > >
    > >
    > > At 03:01 AM 12/2/2007, p404c wrote:
    > >
    > > >--- In peugeot-L@yahoogroups.com, "peugfan@" wrote:
    > > >I could pull only the two plugs on either end; the two middle
    plugs
    > > >wouldn't budge. I soaked them with PB Blaster which didn't do
    much
    > > >good, although maybe after a few months....? Could this be
    related?
    > > >Engine feels like it's "running on three cylinders".
    > > >
    > > >Uh oh. I will predict that the head is severely cracked, with
    two
    > > >of the cracks running down the centre cylinder spark plug
    threads.
    > > >
    > > >This happened to me with one of the 404 KF2 Injections some
    years
    > > >ago (1988) when I froze the coolant on a long descent,
    creating an
    > > >airlock and overheat when I was climbing a hill right
    afterwards.
    > I
    > > >cooked the engine even though it ran that way for only about
    one
    > > >minute.
    > > >
    > > >About a year later, the #4 plug was so tight that I broke two
    spark
    > > >plug tools getting it out. The engine seemed to be running fine
    > > >actually. A post-mortem a year later when I scrapped the car
    > > >revealed a nice dislocation-type crack right up the plug hole
    > > >threading. I still have that head (not sure why - souvenir?).
    > > >Years after that I bought a brand new head which I still keep
    in
    > its
    > > >Peugeot box, as insurance against a similar misfortune with my
    404
    > C.
    > > >
    > > >Regards
    > >
    > > Brian Holm, Parts for Peugeots
    > > at Peugeot Holm, since 1969
    > > 2120 Maple Hill
    > > Plainfield, VT, 05667
    > > 802-454-7132, fax -1310
    > >
    > >
    > > --
    > > No virus found in this outgoing message.
    > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
    > > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.8/1154 - Release
    Date:
    > 11/27/2007 11:40 AM
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    >

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Received on Mon Dec 3 20:42:37 2007